‘Work’ (derogatory)…We keep up to date with the news here, despite our better judgement. And every once in a while in our neck of the woods you’ll hear a few rumblings about a future of AI in Fashion. Now we’re not about to go all luddite here, but as we read the thoughts of people that were understandably concerned about the future place of designers and whether the human artistry was going to be taken from fashion design entirely we couldn’t help but think. “Haven’t we been here before?” Weaving, dyeing, dye making, spinning: All these processes that once were closely in conversation with each other, that informed changes in how each piece of clothing would turn out as it was being made, were entirely “de-artified” throughout the past century and a half. The production of raw materials for making clothes was divided into an ever larger amount of small tasks, all disconnected from each other and shut out from the realm of “Fashion”. Polyester fibre from wherever, blue dye from who cares, pattern cutting by some automated machine from some other country. Rather than working with the materials of an area or the skills of its people, allowing for them to alter and inform your work, now you’d shop around for an area or people that would execute your vision at the cheapest market price. The craftsmanship behind fashion being left as nothing more than an expendable resource. In fashion, ‘art’ became a thing of the designer, and the maker became his tool.
|